Driving While Addicted to Drugs – California Vehicle Code 23152(c) VC

REQUEST A Free CONSULTATION

Strong Legal Representation for Driving While Addicted Charges in California

If you have been charged with driving while addicted to drugs in Los Angeles you are facing one of the least understood DUI charges in California and one that catches most defendants completely off guard. This charge does not require proof that you were under the influence at the time of driving. The addiction itself is the basis of the prosecution’s case and defending it requires a fundamentally different approach than a standard DUI. At The Law Offices of Arash Hashemi our Los Angeles DUI attorney has spent over 20 years defending clients against DUI and drug-related charges throughout Los Angeles County and knows exactly how to analyze and challenge the addiction element that drives every 23152(c) case. Contact our office today at (310) 448-1529 for a free confidential consultation.

Driving While Addicted to Drugs Under California Law

California Vehicle Code 23152(c) makes it unlawful for any person who is addicted to the use of any drug to drive a vehicle. What makes this charge different from every other DUI offense is what the prosecution does not need to prove:

  • They do not need to prove you were impaired at the time of driving
  • They do not need to prove you had any drug in your system when you drove
  • They do not need to prove you were high, intoxicated, or affected by any substance on the day of the arrest

What they need to establish is that you are addicted to a drug and that you drove. That is the entire charge. A person in recovery, someone who uses drugs regularly but claims control over their use, and someone who took nothing on the day of the arrest can all be charged under this statute if the prosecution can establish addiction. Understanding exactly what that means and where the proof of addiction can be challenged is where the defense starts in every 23152(c) case.

How VC 23152(c) Differs From Other DUI Charges

The distinction between this charge and the others filed under VC 23152 is significant and shapes the entire defense approach. VC 23152(a) requires proof the defendant was impaired by alcohol while driving. VC 23152(b) requires proof the defendant’s BAC was at or above 0.08 percent. VC 23152(f) requires proof the defendant was impaired by drugs at the time of driving. VC 23152(c) requires none of those things. The prosecution must only establish that the defendant is addicted to a drug and that they drove a vehicle. Current intoxication is irrelevant to this specific charge.

What Counts as Addiction Under California Law

Addiction under VC 23152(c) requires more than casual or recreational drug use. The prosecution must establish physical or psychological dependence on a drug characterized by compulsive use despite negative consequences and a loss of control over consumption. Occasional use, habitual use, or even frequent use does not automatically constitute addiction under the legal standard. The addiction element is the most frequently challenged aspect of this charge because it requires the prosecution to prove a medical and psychological condition beyond a reasonable doubt and that standard is difficult to meet without strong medical or forensic evidence.

Our Los Angeles DUI attorney challenges the addiction element through independent medical evaluation, the defendant’s treatment history, the absence of any clinical diagnosis of addiction, and any evidence inconsistent with the compulsive use pattern the prosecution must establish. When the prosecution’s evidence of addiction is limited to a prior drug conviction, a positive drug test, or an officer’s observations the charge is vulnerable to direct challenge.

The Methadone and MAT Program Exception

California law expressly exempts from prosecution under 23152(c) vc any person who is currently enrolled in a licensed methadone maintenance or medication-assisted treatment program and is in compliance with that program’s requirements. This exception covers participants in properly licensed and supervised MAT programs who are using methadone or other approved medications as part of treatment for opioid use disorder.

When the defendant was enrolled in a compliant MAT program at the time of the alleged offense our criminal defense attorney presents the enrollment and compliance records immediately and argues for dismissal on the basis of the statutory exception. This exception is one of the most underutilized defenses in 23152(c) cases because many defendants and their families do not know it exists.

Penalties for a VC 23152(c) Conviction

The penalties mirror those for a standard first offense DUI and escalate with each subsequent conviction within a 10-year period. A conviction under 23152(c) vc carries:

  • Up to 6 months in county jail
  • Fines and assessments ranging from $390 to $1,000 plus court fees that can bring the total significantly higher
  • 6-month license suspension
  • Completion of a 3 to 9 month DUI program
  • 3 to 5 years of probation
  • A permanent criminal record affecting employment, professional licensing, and immigration status for non-citizens

The charge becomes a felony when it is the defendant’s fourth DUI offense within 10 years, when injury to another person resulted from the driving, or when the defendant has a prior felony DUI conviction on their record. A felony conviction carries 16 months to 3 years in state prison and the permanent loss of firearm rights under California and federal law.

Legal Defenses Against VC 23152(c) Charges

The addiction element is where the prosecution is most vulnerable in every 23152(c) case. Addiction under California law requires proof of physical or psychological dependence characterized by compulsive use and loss of control — not simply a history of drug use or a prior drug conviction. When the prosecution’s evidence consists of a positive drug test, an arrest record, or an officer’s field observations rather than clinically established dependence our criminal defense attorney challenges the sufficiency of that evidence directly and presents independent medical evaluation establishing that the legal standard for addiction has not been met.

When the defendant was enrolled in a licensed methadone maintenance or medication-assisted treatment program at the time of the arrest the statutory exception applies and the charge should not have been filed. Our criminal defense attorney presents enrollment and compliance records immediately in every case where the MAT exception is available because it is a complete defense that results in dismissal when properly documented.

When the traffic stop lacked reasonable suspicion everything that followed is tainted and a suppression motion removes the evidence that led to the charge. Our criminal defense attorney analyzes the basis for every stop from the first consultation because an unlawful stop is the most direct path to dismissal in any DUI case including one based on addiction.

Contact a Los Angeles DUI Attorney for VC 23152(c) Charges Today

Attorney Arash Hashemi has defended clients against DUI and drug-related charges throughout Los Angeles County for over 20 years. He understands how prosecutors approach 23152(c) vc cases, how to challenge the addiction element through independent medical evidence, and where the defense has the most leverage at every stage. You work directly with Attorney Hashemi at every stage from the first consultation through resolution. Contact our office today for a free confidential consultation.

Schedule a free Consultation:

We are conveniently located in the Westside Towers serving clients facing DUI and drug-related charges across Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, the San Fernando Valley, Long Beach, and all surrounding communities. Your defense starts the moment you call.