Criminal Profiteering – California Penal Code 186 PC

REQUEST A Free CONSULTATION

Strong Legal Representation for Criminal Profiteering Charges in California

Criminal profiteering charges under California Penal Code 186 pc are among the most complex and broadly applied statutes in California criminal law. These cases involve extensive investigations, significant asset forfeiture exposure, and in many cases federal charges filed alongside the state matter. If you have been charged under this statute you need a criminal defense attorney who understands both the legal elements and the investigative methods prosecutors use to build these cases. At The Law Offices of Arash Hashemi our criminal defense attorney has spent over 20 years defending clients against serious criminal charges throughout Los Angeles County. Attorney Hashemi will personally review the full scope of the charges, analyze every piece of evidence, and explain every defense option available in your case. Contact our office today at (310) 448-1529 for a free confidential consultation.

Criminal Profiteering Under California Law

California Penal Code 186 establishes California’s criminal profiteering statute which is the state’s equivalent of the federal RICO law. The statute makes it unlawful to engage in a pattern of criminal profiteering activity for financial gain. A pattern requires two or more related criminal acts committed as part of a scheme to obtain money or property through specified criminal conduct.

The list of predicate offenses that qualify as criminal profiteering activity under california penal code 186 is extensive. It includes murder, robbery, extortion, bribery, grand theft, receiving stolen property, fraud, trafficking in controlled substances, money laundering, and numerous other offenses. The breadth of predicate offenses means the statute can be applied to a wide range of alleged criminal enterprises from organized crime operations to white-collar fraud schemes.

Elements of a PC 186 Charge

To secure a conviction the prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • The defendant engaged in criminal profiteering activity as defined by the statute
  • The conduct constituted a pattern meaning two or more related criminal acts
  • The acts were committed for financial gain
  • The acts were connected by a common scheme, plan, or motive

The pattern element is the most frequently contested in criminal profiteering prosecutions. Two isolated criminal acts that are unrelated in purpose and method do not constitute a pattern. The prosecution must establish the acts were related — that they had the same or similar purpose, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission. When the alleged predicate acts are not sufficiently connected to establish a pattern the profiteering charge cannot be sustained even when the individual underlying offenses are proven.

How Criminal Profiteering Cases Are Handled in Los Angeles

Criminal profiteering investigations in Los Angeles are long-running and resource-intensive. Law enforcement agencies including LAPD, the LA County Sheriff’s Department, the California Attorney General’s office, and in many cases federal agencies conduct these investigations using financial analysis, wiretaps, surveillance, and confidential informant cooperation over extended periods before any arrest is made. By the time charges are filed the prosecution has assembled a substantial financial and documentary record.

Asset forfeiture is a critical component of most PC 186 prosecutions. The statute allows the government to seize and forfeit property connected to the criminal profiteering activity including cash, vehicles, real estate, and financial accounts. The forfeiture proceeding runs alongside the criminal case and requires its own defense strategy. Our criminal defense attorney addresses both the criminal charges and the asset forfeiture exposure simultaneously from the first consultation because the financial consequences of a forfeiture can be as devastating as the criminal sentence itself.

Federal charges under 18 U.S.C. 1962 the federal RICO statute are frequently filed alongside state PC 186 charges when the alleged enterprise crossed state lines or involved federal jurisdictional triggers. When both state and federal charges are filed our criminal defense attorney coordinates the defense across both proceedings from the outset.

Penalties for a PC 186 Conviction in California

A conviction under Penal Code 186 pc carries significant consequences. The criminal sentence for the underlying predicate offenses applies in full and the profiteering conviction adds additional exposure on top of those base sentences. Asset forfeiture of all property connected to the criminal activity is mandatory upon conviction. All convictions result in a permanent felony record affecting employment, professional licensing, and for non-citizens mandatory deportation proceedings.

Legal Defenses Against PC 186 Charges

No Pattern of Criminal Activity

The prosecution must prove two or more related criminal acts connected by a common scheme or purpose. When the alleged predicate acts are unrelated, when they were isolated rather than part of a scheme, or when the connection between them is too attenuated to establish a pattern our criminal defense attorney challenges the pattern element directly. A successful challenge to the pattern element defeats the profiteering charge regardless of whether the individual underlying acts can be proven.

Challenging the Predicate Offenses

A profiteering charge can only be sustained when the underlying predicate acts are themselves proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Our criminal defense attorney challenges every predicate offense independently through suppression motions, evidentiary challenges, and direct challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence on each count. When predicate offenses fall the pattern required for the profiteering charge collapses with them.

Suppression of Financial and Electronic Evidence

Criminal profiteering prosecutions rely heavily on financial records, wiretap recordings, and electronic surveillance gathered over extended investigations. Every warrant authorization and every step in the investigative process must comply with constitutional requirements. When financial records were obtained through an overbroad subpoena, when wiretap authorizations did not meet statutory requirements, or when electronic surveillance was conducted without proper authorization our criminal defense attorney files suppression motions targeting the foundation of the prosecution’s evidentiary case.

Contact a Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney 

Attorney Arash Hashemi has defended clients against serious criminal charges throughout Los Angeles County for over 20 years. When you contact our office he will review the full scope of the charges and the investigation, analyze every predicate offense and the pattern theory, evaluate the asset forfeiture exposure, and give you an honest assessment of every defense available in your case. You work directly with Attorney Hashemi at every stage from the first consultation through resolution. Contact our office today for a free confidential consultation.

Schedule a free Consultation:

We are conveniently located in the Westside Towers serving clients facing criminal profiteering and serious criminal charges across Los Angeles, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, the San Fernando Valley, Long Beach, and all surrounding communities. Your defense starts the moment you call.